The learning technology career development scoping study was an extensive study of learning technology staff, their roles, skills and related institutional factors.

Learning Technology Career Development Scoping Study


Start date: 1 April 2000

End date: 28 February 2001

Funding programme: JISC Organisational Support programme

JISC theme(s): e-Administration

The learning technology career development scoping study was undertaken by a team from the Institute for Learning and Research Technology, University of Bristol, University of Plymouth and University of Glamorgan, funded by the JISC CALT. The study investigated the roles, skills and activities of learning technology staff in the UK and the impact of learning technologies are having on institutions. The study used an institutional audit methodology to gather the data and allow people across an institution to work together to examine their progress and development of learning technology and the people involved in this.

The original study was funded by the JISC between 2000 and 2001. Follow up funding has been provided until 31 March 2003. The follow up funding was provided to write a series of briefing papers targeted at different HE audiences, for example, academic staff, librarians, managers of learning technology staff.  Each of the briefing papers presents findings from the very substantial study which are of particular relevance to each audience.  These briefing papers are available here.  In addition, the original methodological tools have been reviewed and reworked and are available though the ELTI project to assist institutions in undertaking institutional audits to inform the process of embedding learning technologies, assist in developing institutional structures, culture and expertise and to encourage cross boundary collaboration and groupings.

Available Outcomes

A series of briefing papers have been written to disseminate the findings of this major study to key audiences in higher education.  These papers are available as attachements at the foot of this page.  The available papers are listed here:

  • A senior management briefing paper
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for Educational Developers
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for Learning Technology Staff
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for Library Staff
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for Managers of Learning Technology Specialists and Heads of Personnel
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for IT Services Staff
  • Learning Technology: Key implications for Academic Staff
  • About the ELTI institutional audit methodology


Full Report

The full report from the study is available as well as the executive summary as an attachment.

In addition to these briefing papers, the original audit methodology has been piloted with other institutions and is now available through the ELTI project

Aims and Objectives

The Objectives of the Scoping Study were:


1. to describe the various staff functions and activities associated with the embedding, development and support of learning technologies in HE;

2. to describe the different categories of staff to whom these functions and activities are typically devolved;

3. to audit the number of staff in each of the categories across a representative range of UK HEIs;

4. to reveal patterns of staff recruitment and deployment across the audited institutions and, where possible, relate these to critical institutional factors;

5. to produce a number of case studies providing a rich picture of the roles and responsibilities of individual staff members within each of the categories identified, and across a range of different HEIs;

6. to make recommendations for further areas of study and strategic focus by the JISC CALT;

7. to provide guidelines for institutions on staff recruitment, deployment and development for effective support of ICT for learning and teaching.

8. to provide a picture of the strategic institutional and human resource environment in which UK HE institutions are employing and deploying learning technology staff.

The objective of the follow up funding were to:

9. to consult with original study participants on the final report and recommendations

10. to further refine the data and audit tools.

 

  • Last updated on 07/01/09 by Lisa Clifford